You're Not Guilty of Burglary Unless You Intended to Commit a Crime

           In the case of P.D.T. versus the State of Florida, P.D.T. (those being the initials of the juvenile who was charged in that case) was convicted of the crime of burglary of a dwelling.  He appealed his conviction on the basis that the evidence presented at his trial was insufficient to prove that he intended to commit a crime when he entered the home that was supposedly burglarized.  The appellate court deciding his case agreed with him and in doing so stated:


          I.  The evidence presented at P.D.T.'s trial established that:


          A.  Certain homeowners returned from vacation to their residence where they found spilled drinks, empty beer bottles, burn holes in the furniture, burned drapes, and a bong;


          B.  While the homeowners were on vacation, a juvenile (not P.D.T.) threw a party in their home without first getting their permission to do so;


          C.  There were approximately 15 kids at the party, including P.D.T., and all of them knew that they were in the home without the owners' permission; and


          D.  P.D.T. was smoking marijuana and drinking beer at the party.


          II.  The court of appeals continued on to state that in order to prove the crime of burglary, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant either:


          A.  Entered a dwelling without permission and intended to commit a crime in that dwelling; or


          B.  The defendant was invited into a dwelling but then remained in that dwelling secretly, or else he remained in that dwelling after the invitation was withdrawn, and he intended to commit a crime in that dwelling.


          In either case, he must have an intention to commit a crime in the dwelling in order to be guilty of burglary.


          III.  In P.D.T.'s case, the appellate court found that:


          A.  While there was evidence that P.D.T. entered the home without permission;


          B.  There was no evidence that he had intended to commit a crime when he first entered the home.


                    1.  Although the evidence established that P.D.T. and the other kids entered the home to party and that P.D.T. drank beer and smoked marijuana while in the home, there was no evidence that he knew that beer and marijuana were inside the home when he first entered it.


          C.  Because there was no evidence that P.D.T. intended to commit a crime when he first entered the home, the lower-court judge should have found him not guilty of burglary.

Share This Blog


Call Now: (561) 832-4348

* Required Fields
Your Information Is Safe With Us

We respect your privacy. The information you provide will be used to answer your questions or to schedule an appointment if requested.

Follow Us On

400 Clematis St. Suite 206, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Questions or Schedule An Appointment? Click to Call (561) 832-4348
Leave Us a Review
Read Our Reviews
© Copyrights 2022. Florida Criminal Lawyer. All Rights Reserved.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram