Leaving the Scene of an Accident Requires Actual Damage

           Florida law regarding the crime of leaving the scene of an accident states that "[t]he driver of any vehicle which collides with, or is involved in a crash with, any vehicle or other property which is unattended, resulting in any damage to such other vehicle or property, shall immediately stop and shall then and there either locate and notify the operator or owner of the vehicle or other property of the driver’s name and address and the registration number of the vehicle he or she is driving, or shall attach securely in a conspicuous place in or on the vehicle or other property a written notice giving the driver’s name and address and the registration number of the vehicle he or she is driving, and shall without unnecessary delay notify the nearest office of a duly authorized police authority."

 

          In the case of Eddie Powell versus the State of Florida, Mr. Powell was convicted of the crime of leaving the scene of an accident.  He appealed to Florida's First District Court of Appeal on the ground that the prosecutor failed to prove that Powell's car had damaged another vehicle or property.

 

          The appellate court agreed with Powell stating:

 

          1.  The leaving-the-scene-of-an-accident statute provides that any driver who crashes into and damages an unattended vehicle or property has a duty to notify the owner of that property.

 

          2.  The only relevant evidence that the prosecutor presented at Mr. Powell's trial was a photograph of the damage to the car that Powell was driving as well as testimony that he had crashed into either a wooden barricade, a steel beam, or a culvert.

 

          3.  There was no testimony about any damage to whatever object it was that Powell's car struck, and there may have been no damage at all.

 

          4.  Therefore, the prosecutor failed to prove that Powell committed the crime of leaving the scene of an accident.

Florida Law Presumes that Your Criminal Record Should Be Expunged

           In a recent Florida case, a judge denied a person's request to expunge his criminal record even though the prosecutor's office had decided to not file any charges.  The person appealed the judge's decision, and the court deciding his appeal agreed with him.  The appellate court stated that while Florida law does not give someone the legal right to have his record expunged, the law does presume that a record should be expunged if the person making the request satisfies all of the legal requirements for expunging his record.

 

          An article that I wrote on my website, Florida Criminal Records:  Frequently Asked Questions, looks at this particular case and at how the appellate court arrived at its conclusion that the trial judge was required to reconsider the person's request for expunction.

See My New and Improved Criminal Records Website

          My website Florida Criminal Records:  Frequently Asked Questions has some new features that I hope you will look at.  For one, I have added a section that makes it easier for you to send me questions regarding sealing or expunging your record.  A second new feature allows you to complete a short survey that tells you whether you may be eligible to have your record sealed or expunged.  

 

          I hope these new features make it easier for you to navigate my criminal-records website.  Please check it out!

When is a Knife Not Considered a Weapon?

          Jeffrey Browder was charged with committing the crime of possession of a concealed weapon by a convicted felon in the case of Browder versus State of Florida.  The "weapon" that he had was a folding knife with a blade less than four inches long.  The blade of his knife was folded into the handle at the time of his arrest.

 

          Browder filed a motion to dismiss his case in which he argued that Florida statute 790.001(13) specifically states that a "common pocketknife" is not a weapon.  He further argued that his knife was, in fact, just such a knife.

 

          Florida's Second District Court of Appeal agreed with Browder for the following reasons:

 

          1.  In the case of L.B. versus State of Florida, the Florida Supreme Court defined a common pocketknife as "a type of knife occurring frequently in the community which has a blade that folds into the handle and that can be carried in one's pocket."

 

          2.  In the case of J.R.P. versus State of Florida, the Third District Court of Appeal ruled that a knife that is folded closed and has a blade less than four inches long is a common pocketknife and is therefore not a weapon as defined by Florida law.

Licensed to practice in Florida