What Constitutes "Using" a Gun and Why Does It Matter in Federal Court?

Federal law states that anyone who uses a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or a drug-trafficking crime is subject to enhanced punishment.  But what exactly does the word "uses" mean?  Although the statute itself does not define this word, the United States Supreme Court has discussed its meaning in at least three different cases.  An article that I posted on my Federal Criminal Lawyer website examines those cases.

Substantial Assistance and Drug Trafficking Cases

          The penalties are severe for drug trafficking in Florida.  For example, if a person is convicted in State Court of trafficking in 200 grams or more of cocaine but less than 400 grams, that person must be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 7 years and ordered to pay a fine of $100,000.  And if someone is convicted of trafficking in 400 grams or more of cocaine but less than 150 kilograms, that individual must be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 15 years and ordered to pay a fine of $250,000.

 

          One way of avoiding such mandatory penalties is through something called substantial assistance which has been defined as assistance "directed to the investigation and prosecution of criminal activities by persons other than the defendant."

 

          Florida statute section 893.135(4) provides that "[t]he state attorney may move the sentencing court to reduce or suspend the sentence of any person who is convicted of a violation of this section and who provides substantial assistance in the identification, arrest, or conviction of any of that person's accomplices, accessories, coconspirators, or principals or of any other person engaged in trafficking in controlled substances. . . .  The judge hearing the motion may reduce or suspend the sentence if the judge finds that the defendant rendered such substantial assistance."

 

          All is well and good if an individual provides substantial assistance and in return receives a reduction in sentence. Some people, though, are unable to provide the prosecutor with such information.  Others are simply unwilling to do so.  In either case, substantial assistance is of no help to them.

 

          Sometimes, however, a defendant provides a prosecutor with information about the criminal activities of others but still does not receive a sentence reduction because the prosecutor or the judge does not believe that his assistance warrants it since the information turned out to be of little value.  It is particularly frustrating when that occurs because the accused individual has, as it were, stuck his neck out by providing information about others, yet he receives nothing in return.  It is for that reason that some defendants choose not to provide substantial assistance.

How Can You Avoid a Minimum Mandatory Sentence in Federal Court?

A minimum mandatory sentence is a minimum prison sentence that a judge must impose for a particular crime, without consideration of mitigating circumstances. In federal court, there are only two ways to avoid such a sentence: safety valve and cooperation.  An article that I posted on my Federal Criminal Lawyer website examines these two provisions of federal law.

 

Still Another Way to Avoid Prison

         I previously published two articles on this website entitled "Florida Sentencing and Drug Court Programs" and "Amended Law Provides Additional Ways to Avoid Prison."  Both of those articles looked at new laws that make it possible for some people to avoid being sent to prison even though the Florida Sentencing Guidelines call for a prison sentence.

 

         On July 1 of this year, another law--called the Prison Diversion Program--went into effect in Florida that provides still another way for some individuals to avoid going to prison, but only if they meet the following four criteria:

  1. The crime the person committed is a third-degree felony (for which the maximum punishment is 5 years in prison);
  2. The accused individual does not have more than 48 points on the sentencing guidelines, or he has 54 points but 6 of those points are for a violation of probation, community control, or other community supervision, and do not involve a new violation of law;
  3. The person has never been convicted of a forcible felony except for third-degree felonies involving burglary or trespass; and
  4. The crime does not carry a minimum-mandatory sentence.

 

         If a person satisfies these four criteria and the judge decides to not sentence him to prison, then the judge "shall sentence the offender to a term of probation, community control, or community supervision with mandatory participation in a prison diversion program of the Department of Corrections."