What Constitutes the Crime of Child Abuse in Florida?

          In Florida, the crime of child abuse is defined as the:

 

(a)  Intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child;

 

(b)  An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or

 

(c)  Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child.
 

          In the case of State of Florida v. Lanier, Ms. Lanier was an elementary school teacher who was charged with abusing two different children.  The facts surrounding the supposed abuse of one of the children were as follows:

 

          1.  The child, who was four years old at the time of the incident, stepped on the foot of another child while on school property;

 

          2.  Lanier asked the child if he would like to be stepped on and then intentionally and forcefully stomped on the child's foot while he was wearing sneakers and standing on a concrete surface;

 

          3.  The child had no lasting injuries or bruises or any physical trauma requiring treatment;

 

          4.  After the child arrived home, his mother was unable to determine whether he had any injuries; and

 

          5.  Broward County School Board policy provided that corporal punishment should not be used under any circumstances.

 

           The facts surrounding the supposed abuse of the second child were that:

 

          1.  The child, who suffered from attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and autism or an autism-related disorder, was also four years old at the time of the incident;

 

          2.  Lanier knew that the child suffered from these disorders;

 

          3.  The child was misbehaving in the classroom so Lanier punished the child for disrupting nap time for other students by placing the child unrestrained in a chair a short distance outside the classroom;

 

          4.  Lanier could see the chair, which was located near a set of three steps, from where she was located inside her classroom;

 

          5.  Lanier pushed the chair towards the steps with her foot, and the child fell down the steps striking his head on some part of the stairway or ground and in the process injured his head and leg;

 

          6.  The child's injuries healed in a relatively short amount of time.

 

         Lanier filed a motion to dismiss in which she argued that her actions did not constitute the crime of child abuse.  Although you might think that stomping on the foot of a four-year-old child and pushing a chair using one's foot while a four-year-old child is sitting in it close to the top of a set of stairs is undoubtedly child abuse, you would be mistaken.  Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal agreed with Lanier that her case  should be dismissed and in doing so stated:

 

"There was no intentional act that could 'reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child' under [the child-abuse statute].  The foot 'stomp' caused no bruises, no physical trauma, and required no treatment; such an act could not 'reasonably be expected' to cause physical injury. Similarly, pushing a chair 'towards' steps, or positioning a chair near steps, is very different from pushing a chair down the steps. Sitting near steps, even for a child with [attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder], is not an activity that could reasonably be expected to result in physical injury to the child."

 

          If you have been charged with child abuse, it is very important that you and your lawyer determine whether your alleged actions actually violate the child-abuse statute.  Like Ms. Lanier, you too may be able to have your case dismissed.

20 Legal Websites Containing Useful Information for You

        There are many websites that provide legal information, some sites being better than others.  In this article, I have provided links to several websites which contain legal information that hopefully you will find both interesting and useful.

 

1.  The United States Constitution.

 

2.  Opinions from the United States Supreme Court.

 

3.  The home page for the Federal Courts of the United States.

 

4.  The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

 

5.  Titles to the United States Code.

 

6.  The Code of Federal Regulations.

 

7.  The home page of the Internal Revenue Service.

 

8.  The Florida Constitution.

 

9.  Opinions from the Florida Supreme Court.

 

10.  Opinions from Florida's five District Courts of Appeal.

 

11.  Titles to the Florida Statutes.

 

12.  Florida Rules of Court Procedure.

 

13.  The home page of the Office of the Attorney General of Florida.

 

14.  The Florida Administrative Code.

 

15.  Administrative Orders of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, West Palm Beach, Florida.

 

16.  The Office of the State Attorney, West Palm Beach, Florida.

 

17.  The home page of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

 

18.  The Sheriff's Office for Palm Beach County Florida.

 

19.  The home page for Findlaw.

 

20.  Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute.

Criminal Deportation and a New U.S. Supreme Court Case

          The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case called Padilla v. Kentucky in which the issue was whether Mr. Padilla's lawyer provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel when he failed to tell Padilla that he might be deported from the U.S. after pleading guilty to drug-distribution charges because he was a lawful permanent resident of the United States rather than a naturalized citizen.  According to Padilla, his lawyer told him not to worry about being deported because he had been living in the U.S. for over 40 years.

         

          The Supreme Court agreed with Padilla that his lawyer's legal representation was constitutionally deficient and provided the following reasons for coming to that conclusion:

         

          1.  The weight of prevailing professional norms in the legal community supports the view that an attorney must advise her noncitizen client of the risk of deportation if the client pleads guilty to certain criminal charges;

 

          2.  The Supreme Court has previously recognized the importance to a noncitizen client of preserving his right to remain in the U.S. if he is already here legally;

 

          3.  The consequences of Padilla's plea bargain could easily have been determined by Padilla's lawyer had he simply read the federal statute pertaining to deportation;

 

          4.    According to that particular statute, Padilla's deportation was presumptively mandatory if he pled guilty to drug-distribution charges; and

 

          5.  The legal advice provided by Padilla's attorney was incorrect.

 

          The Supreme Court continued on to state, however, that in those cases in which the deportation consequences of a plea agreement are unclear, a criminal defense attorney need do no more than advise her client that the pending criminal charges may carry adverse immigration consequences.  But when deportation consequences are clear, as they were in Padilla's case, it is a lawyer's duty to provide correct legal advice to her client.

 

          If you are not a citizen of the United States and are facing criminal charges, it is essential that you consult with a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney.  To not do so is to run the risk of ending up in the same situation as Mr. Padilla.

 

          If you would like to learn more about the Padilla decision and its likely impact, you may wish to read an article published by the Immigrant Defense Project entitled "Duty of Criminal Defense Counsel Representing an Immigrant Defendant After Padilla v. Kentucky."